‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Fossils. إظهار كافة الرسائل
‏إظهار الرسائل ذات التسميات Fossils. إظهار كافة الرسائل

Meet Pulanesaura eocollum, a new species of dinosaur

| التعليقات

Wits PhD student Blair McPhee has described a new species of dinosaur in a paper to be published in Scientific Reports on 19 September 2015. The new dinosaur, named Pulanesaura eocollum, means the "Rain lizard".

Meet Pulanesaura eocollum, a new species of dinosaur
Reconstruction of Pulanesaura 
[Credit: Wits University]
According to the authors of the paper, Pulanesaura was an early member of the long-necked sauropod lineage of dinosaurs, famously represented by Brontosaurus.

Eating habits

The researchers says that the specialised teeth, vertebrae, and forelimb of Pulanesaura was an indication that the new species would have spent all of its time on all fours, browsing lower vegetation. This novel feeding strategy would have resulted in a more energetically conservative feeding posture for Pulanesaura.

This is unlike more primitive prosauropod (scientifically referred to as "basal sauropodomorph") dinosaurs, which still relied on the forelimb to aid in gathering food from across a broad range of the forest canopy.

Early sauropods like Pulanesaura are incredibly rare in the fossil record, with only a handful of good sauropod specimens known from the Early Jurassic, a time period between 200 and 180 million years ago, when Pulanesaura would have lived.

Meet Pulanesaura eocollum, a new species of dinosaur
Illustration showing the locations where recovered bones would have
 been in a living Pulanesaura [Credit: Wits University]
Much more common at that time in South Africa were bipedal or semi-bipedal sauropodomorph dinosaurs like Massospondylus and Antetonitrus. This might have been because the unique feeding strategy of Pulanesaura restricted the number of lower-browsing dinosaurs that the early Jurassic landscape could have supported.

"This dinosaur showcases the unexpected diversity of locomotion and feeding strategies present in South Africa 200 million years ago. This has serious implications for how dinosaurs were carving up their ecosystems," says McPhee.

"We used to think that only two species of sauropodomorph dinosaur were present in South Africa. Now we know that the picture was much more complicated, with lots of species present. But Pulanesaura is still special because it was doing something that all these newly discovered species weren't," says Choiniere.

Pulanesaura description

  • Pulanesaura was relatively small (for a sauropod), at about eight metres in length, two metres at the hips, and 5 tonnes in body mass.
  • Unlike its bipedal ancestors, who used the forelimb as an additional means of gathering food, Pulanesaura would have had to rely on the flexibility of its long neck alone.
  • Flexibility in the neck meant that the forelimb of Pulanesaura was able to shift to a position entirely beneath the body, thus better supporting the weight of the animal.
  • Modifications of the neck may have also meant that it would not have needed to move its body about as much to feed – and less movement means less energy expended. This method of feeding was taken to extreme lengths by all gigantic sauropod species.

Bonnan adds, "The traditional picture of sauropod evolution is that when they came onto the scene, the other sauropodomorphs were pushed aside. Pulanesaura turns this notion on its head. Sauropod evolution was occurring alongside and influenced by competition with their sauropodomorph brethren."

History of the name

The fossils of Pulanesaura were found at Heelbo, a farm in the Eastern Free State where two other recently described South African dinosaur species also come from – Aardonyx and Arcusaurus, both more primitive members of the same lineage.

Meet Pulanesaura eocollum, a new species of dinosaur
Chart showing other animals from Pulanesaura's day, many of which relied
 on front legs to gather food rather than using a long, flexible neck 
[Credit: Wits University]
The late Naude Bremer, former owner of Heelbo, was a strong proponent of palaeontology on his farm. "Pulane" was the childhood Sesotho nickname of Bremer's daughter, Panie.

Roughly translated, "Pulane" means "comes with rain," and Pulanesaura was excavated during a particularly rainy period on the property.

These species, along with limb bones of a small predatory dinosaur, the teeth of a huge predatory dinosaur and other bones of as-yet-unknown dinosaurs make Heelbo one of the richest dinosaur localities in southern Africa.

Yates, who excavated the fossil, believes that Heelbo Farm was different from the rest of South Africa 200 million years ago when Pulanesaura was alive.

"The dinosaur fossils we see at Heelbo are different from the typical South African Early Jurassic species and they might have been living in a rare habitat different than the drier ones favoured by famous species like Massospondylus," he says.

Neveling says what makes Heelbo unique is the fact that unlike the majority of localities of this age which represent dry flood plains, its geology is characterised by a dense concentration of river channel deposits.

"Similar to modern arid environments, the river banks would have supported much denser vegetation that would have provided plenty of food to budding giants," Neveling adds.

Source: Wits University [August 20, 2015]

Earliest baboon found at Malapa

| التعليقات

A team from Wits University's Evolutionary Studies Institute has discovered a fossil monkey specimen representing the earliest baboon ever found.

Earliest baboon found at Malapa
Male P. angusticeps in lateral (top left), oblique (top right), dorsal (middle) 
and inferior (bottom) views [Credit: Wits University]
Dating back more than 2 million years ago (between 2.026-2.36 million years ago), the partial skull was found at Malapa, in the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site, the same site where the partial skeletons of the new early hominin species, Australopithecus sediba, were discovered in 2010.

"Baboons are known to have co-existed with hominins at several fossil localities in East Africa and South Africa and they are sometimes even used as comparative models in human evolution," says Dr Christopher Gilbert (Hunter College, CUNY), lead author of the study published in the journal PLOS ONE.

The skull, found during excavations for A. sediba, confirms earlier suggestions that the fossil baboon species to which it belongs, Papio angusticeps, was in fact closely related to modern baboons, and quite possibly the earliest known members of the modern baboon species Papio hamadryas.

Earliest baboon found at Malapa
CT scans show UW 88-866 in oblique (left) and lateral (right) views 
[Credit: Wits University]
Modern baboons (genus Papio) are typically divided into a number of populations recognised as either species or subspecies spread all throughout sub-Saharan Africa and into the Arabian Peninsula. Despite their evolutionary success, modern baboon origins in the fossil record have not well-understood or agreed upon.

"According to molecular clock studies, baboons are estimated to have diverged from their closest relatives by ~1.8 to 2.2 million years ago; however, until now, most fossil specimens known within this time range have been either too fragmentary to be definitive or too primitive to be confirmed as members of the living species Papio hamadryas," says Gilbert.

"The specimen from Malapa and our current analyses help to confirm the suggestion of previous researchers that P. angusticeps may, in fact, be an early population of P. hamadryas."

Earliest baboon found at Malapa
A comparison of morphology in UW 88-886 (left), P. angusticepts males (CO 100, center),
 and P. izodi males (TP 89-11-1, right) [Credit: Wits University]
Analyses of the specimen at Malapa, and the group of fossil specimens traditionally placed in the fossil species P. angusticeps, suggest that P. angusticeps displays anatomy that is consistent with modern baboon populations.

"If you placed a number of P. angusticeps specimens into a modern osteology collection, I don't think you'd be able pick them out as any different from those of modern baboons from East and South Africa," says Gilbert.

Furthermore, the estimated age of the specimen from Malapa, ~2.026-2.36 Ma, is in almost perfect agreement with molecular clock analyses for the initial appearance of modern baboons. Thus, the specimen at Malapa may help to solve the evolutionary origins of these highly successful animals and confirm the estimates of molecular studies.

In addition, because monkeys are widely recognised as key time-sensitive elements in the fossil record, the fact that the Malapa P. angusticeps specimen is well-dated allows future studies to better estimate the age of fossil sites where the species is found. South African early hominin sites, in particular, may be able to achieve more accurate age estimates on the basis of these new findings.

Source: University of the Witwatersrand [August 19, 2015]

Earliest 'modern' hand nearly two million years old

| التعليقات

A tiny, 1.85 million-year-old bone from the little finger of a human ancestor unearthed in East Africa has revealed the oldest "modern" hand ever found, scientists reported Tuesday.

Earliest 'modern' hand nearly two million years old
A picture released on August 18, 2015 by Nature Communications shows a OH 86 hominin 
manual proximal phalanx in (from L-R) dorsal, lateral, palmar (distal is top for each) 
and proximal views [Credit: AFP/Rodrigo Dominguez]
The discovery of the pinkie bone pushes back in time a key step in the evolution of our forebear from tree-climbing foragers to tool-wielding hunters, the authors say.

It also hints at the existence of a larger, more human-like creature than others known to have lived at that time in the same region—one of the hotspots of human origin—in modern-day Tanzania.

The hand is one of the critical anatomical features distinguishing humans, and even a 3.6-centimetre (1.5-inch), two-million-year-old fragment can reveal a lot about body type and behaviour.

The shape of our forebears' hands was both a reflection of their stage of evolution, and a driver of that evolution, explained lead author Manuel Dominguez-Rodrigo, a researcher at the Institute of Evolution in Africa in Madrid.

"Our hand evolved to allow us a variety of grips and enough gripping power to allow us the widest range of manipulation observed in any primate," he said by email.

"It is this manipulation capability that interacted with our brains to develop our intelligence, mainly through the invention and use of tools."

Earliest 'modern' hand nearly two million years old
A picture released on August 18, 2015 by Nature Communications shows 
an OH 86 hominin phalanx overlaid on a modern human hand
[Credit: AFP/Jason Heaton]
What scientists call "modern human-like" hand anatomy has several defining characteristics.

One is a longer thumb, allowing us to grip more precisely and to open our hands more fully.

Another is the straightening of our phalanges, the general name given to the three bones found in each finger. Curved phalanges were adapted for climbing trees and swinging from branches.

"A modern-like hand in the past would tell us when humans became fully terrestrial and when and how efficiently our ancestors used tools," Dominguez-Rodrigo said.

That transition happened in two main stages.

After the earliest hominins—which includes all members of the Homo genus—began walking on two legs some six million years ago, the hand evolved a longer thumb.

But the fingers remained curved, suggesting that trees remained part of their habitat.

This "double locomotion"—on the ground, through the trees—remained the norm for another four million years.

Earliest 'modern' hand nearly two million years old
A picture released on August 18, 2015 by Nature Communications shows people 
excavating the fossiliferous layer at PTK in the Olduvai Gorge, one of the most
 important paleoanthropological sites in the world 
[Credit: AFP/Rodrigo Dominguez]
"I always had trouble understanding how Homo habilis—barely taller than one metre (three feet)—could efficiently hunt animals that big," Dominguez-Rodrigo said.

The existence of a bigger, more modern-looking hominin would help explain this puzzle.

Other experts not involved in the study agreed.

"It brings support to those who challenge the view that Homo habilis was the maker of the stone artifacts becoming abundant in layers of this time period," commented Jean-Jacques Hublin, director of the department of human evolution at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

At the same time, Hublin and others challenged the broad conclusions reached on the basis of such slim evidence.

"One single bone from a pinkie finger does not imply a whole modern human-like skeleton," Hublin said by email.

Another leader in the field, Tracy L. Kivell of the School of Anthropology and Conservation at the University of Kent, was even more sceptical.

"This single bone tells us nothing about what the rest of the hand looked like, let alone what the rest of the skeleton looked like," she told AFP by mail.

"If recent, more complete hominin fossil discoveries have taught us anything, it's that strange combinations of more derived human-like features and more primitive australopith-like features throughout the skeleton are likely the rule, rather than the exception, especially at this time period."

The study has been published by the journal Nature Communications.

Author: Marlowe Hood | Source: AFP [August 18, 2015]

Chengjiang biota: Bringing fossils into focus

| التعليقات

Researchers from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU) in Munich have used computed microtomography (micro-CT) to identify to the species level an exceptionally wellpreserved fossil arthropod from the famous Chengjiang Lagerstatte in China.

Chengjiang biota: Bringing fossils into focus
Chengjiang biota: Bringing fossils into focus
The figure above shows a light micrograph of the fossil, while the microtomographic 
image below reveals fine details of structures hitherto concealed
 within the slab [Credit: LMU]
Modern imaging methods make it possible to perform detailed, non-invasive studies on the internal structures of irreplaceable fossil specimens. Researchers led by Dr. Yu Liu of LMU's Department of Biology II now demonstrate the power of this approach by using computed microtomography (micro-CT) to investigate a specimen recovered from the famous fossil beds of Chengjiang in southwestern China. The results of the study, which appear in the online Open Access journal Scientific Reports, demonstrate the ability of micro-CT to reveal anatomical details preserved inside fossil slabs.

The fossil Lagerstatte Chengjiang in China is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, which harbors a rich fossil assemblage dating from 520 million years ago. The rocks preserved here are among the oldest that document the so-called Cambrian explosion -- the relatively abrupt appearance of a highly diverse, species-rich multicellular fauna in the fossil record. And many of the specimens discovered in these beds are extremely well preserved. In particular, their soft parts have left clear impressions in the sediments that accumulated here.

Imprints of organisms with mineralized skeletons often extend for several millimeters below the surface of the slabs of sediment in which they are embedded. In order to study their structure, such specimens must first be removed from the surrounding rock matrix. "Because this inevitably involves the destruction of at least some of their fine structure, most of the published work on Chengjiang's fossils is based on careful examination of surface structures with the help of optical and fluorescence microscopy," as Yu Liu explains.

The LMU team now reports the first in-depth microtomographic study of a three-dimensionally preserved fossil from Chengjiang. The term micro-CT refers to a method in which multiple X-radiographs of a specimen are taken from different angles, and then assembled with the help of mathematical procedures to yield a three-dimensional model of the original. It is now a well-established analytical tool in palaeontology, but has not yet been widely applied to fossils from Chengjiang.

Yu Liu's study uncovers internal structures in a specimen recovered from the site, which allow the fossil to be identified as Xandarella spectaculum, a rare species of arthropod that shows similarities to the iconic (but now extinct) trilobites, and is known only from Chengjiang. The three-dimensional reconstruction reveals informative details of the fossil's morphology, which had hitherto remained hidden in the rock matrix. On the basis of the new results, Yu Liu confidently asserts that "microtomography is a powerful technique for the analysis of the three-dimensionally preserved specimens recovered at Chengjiang."

Source: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen [August 18, 2015]

Fossil study reveals dogs evolved with climate change

| التعليقات

Old dogs can teach humans new things about evolution. In Nature Communications a new study of North American dog fossils as old as 40 million years suggests that the evolutionary path of whole groups of predators can be a direct consequence of climate change.

Fossil study reveals dogs evolved with climate change
Two early dogs, Hesperocyon, left and the later Sunkahetanka, were both 
ambush-style predators. As climate changes transformed their habitat, 
dogs evolved pursuit hunting styles and forelimb anatomy to match 
[Credit: Mauricio Anton]
"It's reinforcing the idea that predators may be as directly sensitive to climate and habitat as herbivores," said Christine Janis, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at Brown University, who worked with lead author Borja Figueirido, a former Brown Fulbright postdoctoral researcher who is now a professor at the Universidad de Malaga in Spain. "Although this seems logical, it hadn't been demonstrated before."

The climate in North America's heartland back around 40 million years ago was warm and wooded. Dogs are native to North America. The species of the time, fossils show, were small animals that would have looked more like mongooses than any dogs alive today and were well-adapted to that habitat. Their forelimbs were not specialized for running, retaining the flexibility to grapple with whatever meal unwittingly walked by.

But beginning just a few million years later, the global climate began cooling considerably and in North America the Rocky Mountains had reached a threshold of growth that made the continental interior much drier. The forests slowly gave way to open grasslands.

Pups of the plains

Did this transition affect the evolution of carnivores? To find out, Figueirido and the research team, including Jack Tseng of the American Museum of Natural History in New York, examined the elbows and teeth of 32 species of dogs spanning the period from ca. 40 million years ago to 2 million years ago. They saw clear patterns in those bones at the museum: At the same time that climate change was opening up the vegetation, dogs were evolving from ambushers to pursuit-pounce predators like modern coyotes or foxes -- and ultimately to those dogged, follow-a-caribou-for-a-whole-day pursuers like wolves in the high latitudes.

"The elbow is a really good proxy for what carnivores are doing with their forelimbs, which tells their entire locomotion repertoire," Janis said.

Fossil study reveals dogs evolved with climate change
This is a skeleton of a 30-million-year-old fossil dog, Archaeocyon, in the 
American Museum of Natural History canid collection. The earliest dogs, 
going back 40 million years in North America, were animals no larger 
than a Chihuahua or a common house cat today 
[Credit: © AMNH/D. Finnin]
The telltale change in those elbows has to do with the structure of the base where the humerus articulates with the forearm, changing from one where the front paws could swivel (palms can be inward or down) for grabbing and wrestling prey to one with an always downward-facing structure specialized for endurance running. Modern cats still rely on ambush rather than the chase (cheetahs are the exception) and have the forelimbs to match, Janis said, but canines signed up for lengthier pursuits.

In addition, the dogs' teeth trended toward greater durability, Figueirido's team found, consistent perhaps with the need to chow down on prey that had been rolled around in the grit of the savannah, rather than a damp, leafy forest floor.

Not an 'arms race' of limbs

The study, with some of Janis' prior research, suggests that predators do not merely evolve as an "arms race" response to their prey. They don't develop forelimbs for speedy running just because the deer and the antelope run faster. While the herbivores of this time were evolving longer legs, the predator evolution evident in this study tracked in time directly with the climate-related changes to habitat rather than to the anatomy of their prey species.

After all, it wasn't advantageous to operate as a pursuit-and-pounce predator until there was room to run.

"There's no point in doing a dash and a pounce in a forest," Janis quipped. "They'll smack into a tree."

If predators evolved with climate change over the last 40 million years, the authors argue, then they likely will have to continue in response to the human-created climate change underway now. The new results could help predict the effects we are setting in motion.

"Now we're looking into the future at anthropogenic changes," Janis said.

Source: Brown University [August 18, 2015]

Discovery of a salamander in amber sheds light on evolution of Caribbean islands

| التعليقات

More than 20 million years ago, a short struggle took place in what is now the Dominican Republic, resulting in one animal getting its leg bitten off by a predator just before it escaped. But in the confusion, it fell into a gooey resin deposit, to be fossilized and entombed forever in amber.

Discovery of a salamander in amber sheds light on evolution of Caribbean islands
This is the first-ever discovery of a salamander preserved in amber, from an 
unlikely spot - the Dominican Republic, where all salamanders are now extinct 
[Credit: George Poinar, Jr./Oregon State University]
The fossil record of that event has revealed something not known before -- that salamanders once lived on an island in the Caribbean Sea. Today, they are nowhere to be found in the entire Caribbean area.

The never-before-seen and now extinct species of salamander, named Palaeoplethodon hispaniolae by the authors of the paper, adds more clues to the ecological and geological history of the islands of the Caribbean. Findings about its brief life and traumatic end -- it was just a baby -- have been published in the journal Palaeodiversity, by researchers from Oregon State University and the University of California at Berkeley.

"I was shocked when I first saw it in amber," said George Poinar, Jr., a professor emeritus in the OSU College of Science, and a world expert in the study of insects, plants and other life forms preserved in amber, all of which allow researchers to reconstruct the ecology of ancient ecosystems.

"There are very few salamander fossils of any type, and no one has ever found a salamander preserved in amber," Poinar said. "And finding it in Dominican amber was especially unexpected, because today no salamanders, even living ones, have ever been found in that region."

This fossil salamander belonged to the family Plethodontidae, a widespread family that today is still very common in North America, particularly the Appalachian Mountains. But it had back and front legs lacking distinct toes, just almost complete webbing with little bumps on them. As such, it might not have been as prolific a climber as some modern species, Poinar said, and it probably lived in small trees or tropical flowering plants.

Discovery of a salamander in amber sheds light on evolution of Caribbean islands
Artist's image shows what the only salamander ever preserved in amber 
might have looked like in real life [Credit: George Poinar, Jr./
Oregon State University]
This specimen, Poinar said, came from an amber mine in the northern mountain range of the Dominican Republic, between Puerto Plata and Santiago.

"The discovery of this fossil shows there once were salamanders in the Caribbean, but it's still a mystery why they all went extinct," Poinar said. "They may have been killed by some climatic event, or were vulnerable to some type of predator."

Also a mystery, he said, is how salamanders got there to begin with. The physical evidence suggests the fossil represents an early lineage of phethodon salamanders that evolved in tropical America.

This fossil is 20-30 million years old, and its lineage may go back 40-60 million years ago when the Proto-Greater Antilles, that now include islands such as Cuba, Jamaica, Puerto Rico and Hispaniola, were still joined to North and South America. Salamanders may have simply stayed on the islands as they began their tectonic drift across the Caribbean Sea. They also may have crossed a land bridge during periods of low sea level, or it's possible a few specimens could have floated in on debris, riding a log across the ocean.

Such findings, Poinar said, help both ecologists and geologists to reconstruct ancient events of Earth's history.

"There have been fossils of rhinoceroses found in Jamaica, jaguars in the Dominican Republic, and the tree that produced the Dominican amber fossils is most closely related to one that's native to East Africa," Poinar said. "All of these findings help us reconstruct biological and geological aspects of ancient ecosystems."

Source: Oregon State University [August 17, 2015]

Paleobotanists identify what could be the mythical 'first flower'

| التعليقات

Indiana University paleobotanist David Dilcher and colleagues in Europe have identified a 125 million- to 130 million-year-old freshwater plant as one of earliest flowering plants on Earth.

Paleobotanists identify what could be the mythical 'first flower'
A large intact specimen of the fossil, Montsechia. Usually only small fragmentary
 pieces of the fossil are found [Credit: David Dilcher]
The finding, reported Aug. 17 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, represents a major change in the presumed form of one of the planet's earliest flowers, known as angiosperms.

"This discovery raises significant questions about the early evolutionary history of flowering plants, as well as the role of these plants in the evolution of other plant and animal life," said Dilcher, an emeritus professor in the IU Bloomington College of Arts and Sciences' Department of Geological Sciences.

The aquatic plant, Montsechia vidalii, once grew abundantly in freshwater lakes in what are now mountainous regions in Spain. Fossils of the plant were first discovered more than 100 years ago in the limestone deposits of the Iberian Range in central Spain and in the Montsec Range of the Pyrenees, near the country's border with France.

Also previously proposed as one of the earliest flowers is Archaefructus sinensis, an aquatic plant found in China.

"A 'first flower' is technically a myth, like the 'first human,'" said Dilcher, an internationally recognized expert on angiosperm anatomy and morphology who has studied the rise and spread of flowering plants for decades. "But based on this new analysis, we know now that Montsechia is contemporaneous, if not more ancient, than Archaefructus."

He also asserted that the fossils used in the study were "poorly understood and even misinterpreted" during previous analyses.

"The reinterpretation of these fossils provides a fascinating new perspective on a major mystery in plant biology," said Donald H. Les, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Connecticut, who is the author of a commentary on the discovery in the journal PNAS. "David's work is truly an important contribution to the continued quest to unravel the evolutionary and ecological events that accompanied the rise of flowering plants to global prominence."

Paleobotanists identify what could be the mythical 'first flower'
Illustrations based on fossilized remains show long- and short-leaved forms 
of the plant and a single seed [Credit: Oscar Sanisidro]
The conclusions are based upon careful analyses of more than 1,000 fossilized remains of Montsechia, whose stems and leaf structures were coaxed from stone by applying hydrochloric acid on a drop-by-drop basis. The plant's cuticles -- the protective film covering the leaves that reveals their shape -- were also carefully bleached using a mixture of nitric acid and potassium chlorate.

Examination of the specimens was conducted under a stereomicroscope, light microscope and scanning electron microscope.

The age of the plant at 125 million to 130 million years is based upon comparisons to other fossils in the same area, notably the freshwater algae charophytes, which places Montsechia in the Barremian age of the early Cretaceous period, making this flowering plant a contemporary of dinosaurs such as the brachiosaurus and iguanodon.

The precise, painstaking analysis of fossilized structures remains crucial to paleobotany, in contrast to other biological fields, due to the current inability to know the molecular characters of ancient plants from millions of years ago, Dilcher said.

This careful examination was particularly important to Montsechia since most modern observers might not even recognize the fossil as a flowering plant.

"Montsechia possesses no obvious 'flower parts,' such as petals or nectar-producing structures for attracting insects, and lives out its entire life cycle under water," he said. "The fruit contains a single seed" -- the defining characteristic of an angiosperm -- "which is borne upside down."

In terms of appearance, Dilcher said, Montsechia resembles its most modern descendent, identified in the study as Ceratophyllum. Also known as coontails or hornworts, Ceratophyllum is a dark green aquatic plant whose coarse, tufty leaves make it a popular decoration in modern aquariums and koi ponds.

Next up, Dilcher and colleagues want to understand more about the species connecting Montsechia and Ceratophyllum, as well as delve deeper into when precisely other species of angiosperms branched off from their ancient forefathers.

"There's still much to be discovered about how a few early species of seed-bearing plants eventually gave rise to the enormous, and beautiful, variety of flowers that now populate nearly every environment on Earth," he said.

Source: Indiana University [August 17, 2015]

50,000-year-old human skull found in Siberian cave

| التعليقات

Fragments of an early human skull and rib were found in Pleistocene era layers in Strashnaya Cave, it was announced today by Professor Andrey Krivoshapkin, head of Archeology and Ethnography at Novosibirsk State University. These are expected to be 'no younger than 50,000 years' old, he said.

50,000-year-old human skull found in Siberian cave
Ancient human remains from a Siberian cave dating back 50,000 years or more
 could provide a missing link in understanding how modern humans evolved. 
The excavation of the bones is shown in the picture above 
[Credit: Andrey Krivoshapkin]
Another find, dating to at least 35,000 years ago, was a tiny fragment of finger bone - a nail phalange.

'We struck really lucky this year,' he said. 'During works at Pleistocene levels of Strashnaya Cave we found new anthropological material. In levels dating to 35,000 to 40,000 years ago, we found a fragment of a human nail phalanx.

'Further down (in older layers) there was a fragment of a human skull and, even further, a fragment of a rib which we believe is human.'

He stated: 'Both the skull and the rib should be no younger than 50,000 years old.'

The discoveries have led to palpable excitement among scientists in Siberia.

The academic said that 'in an ideal world we would like to have the nail phalange to belong to a modern man, carrying genes of both Neanderthal and Denisovan man, and the older find (the skull) belonging to Neanderthal Man, and the oldest fragment - the rib - to be from Denisovan man.'

50,000-year-old human skull found in Siberian cave
Archaeologists leading the excavation at Strashnaya cave say the skull is 
'no younger than 50,000-years-old' and may be even older 
[Credit: Andrey Krivoshapkin]
However, he cautioned: 'Right now, however these are just my fantasies.  As we know, analysis results might turn out to be completely unexpected. But whatever the results, they will help us understand the interaction of modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans in the Altai territory.'

It is the first discovery of man's remains at the cave for more than a quarter of a century. In 1989, archaeologists found human teeth dating to the Upper Paleolithic period, around 20,000 years ago. The skull fragment was found alongside 'labour tools' which match previously discovered implements confirmed as belong to Neanderthals, he said.

The cave stands on the left bank of the River Inya, some 2.5 km north of Tigiryok village in Altai region. Earlier excavations here found variety of Stone Age tools along with Bronze, Iron and Middle Ages pottery.

The cave is around 125 kilometres west of the more famous Denisova Cave which changed our understanding of the origins of man.

Denisova was home through many millennia to both Neanderthals and our modern human ancestors. It was here that, in 2008, a tiny finger bone fragment of so-called 'X woman' was discovered,  a young female who lived around 41,000 years ago, analysis of which indicated that she was genetically distinct from both Neanderthals and modern humans.

This previously unknown hominin species or subspecies - long extinct - was christened the Denisovans after the name of this cave. One conclusion from analysis of ancient bone fragments is that our own species, Homo sapiens, occasionally had assignations with both Neanderthals and Denisovans.

Source: The Siberian Times [August 14, 2015]

Marks on 3.4-million-year-old bones not due to trampling, analysis confirms

| التعليقات

Marks on two 3.4 million-year-old animal bones found at the site of Dikika, Ethiopia, were not caused by trampling, an extensive statistical analysis confirms. The Journal of Human Evolution is publishing the results of the study, which developed new methods of fieldwork and analysis for researchers exploring the origins of tool making and meat eating in our ancestors.

Marks on 3.4-million-year-old bones not due to trampling, analysis confirms
Detail of the marks on a fossilized rib bone, one of the two controversial bones. 
“The best match we have for the marks, using currently available data, would 
still be butchery with stone tools," says anthropologist Jessica Thompson 
[Credit: Zeresenay Alemseged]
"Our analysis clearly shows that the marks on these bones are not characteristic of trampling," says Jessica Thompson, an assistant professor of anthropology at Emory University and lead author of the study. "The best match we have for the marks, using currently available data, would still be butchery with stone tools."

The 12 marks on the two specimens -- a long bone from a creature the size of a medium antelope and a rib bone from an animal closer in size to a buffalo -- most closely resemble a combination of purposeful cutting and percussion marks, Thompson says. "When these bones were hit, they were hit with enormous force and multiple times."

The paper supports the original interpretation that the damage to the two bones is characteristic of stone tool butchery, published in Nature in 2010. That finding was sensational, since it potentially pushed back evidence for the use of stone tools, as well as the butchering of large animals, by about 800,000 years.

The Nature paper was followed in 2011 by a rebuttal in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), suggesting that the bones were marked by incidental trampling in abrasive sediments. That sparked a series of debates about the significance of the discovery and whether the bones had been trampled.

For the current paper, Thompson and her co-authors examined the surfaces of a sample of more than 4000 other bones from the same deposits. They then used statistical methods to compare more than 450 marks found on those bones to experimental trampling marks and to the marks on the two controversial specimens.

"We would really like to understand what caused these marks," Thompson says. "One of the most important questions in human evolution is when did we start eating meat, since meat is considered a likely explanation for how we fed the evolution of our big brains."

Evidence shows that our genus, Homo, emerged around 2.8 million years ago. Until recently, the earliest known stone tools were 2.6 million years old. Changes had already been occurring in the organization of the brains of the human lineage, but after this time there was also an increase in overall brain size. This increased size has largely been attributed to a higher quality diet.

Marks on 3.4-million-year-old bones not due to trampling, analysis confirms
Anthropologist Jessica Thompson at work in the field in Africa. She specializes 
in the study of what happens to bones after an animal dies 
[Credit: Zeresenay Alemseged]
While some other apes are known to occasionally hunt and eat animals smaller than themselves, they do not hunt or eat larger animals that store abundant deposits of fat in the marrow of their long bones. A leading hypothesis in paleoanthropology is that a diet rich in animal protein combined with marrow fat provided the energy needed to fuel the larger human brain.

The animal bones in the Dikika site, however, have been reliably dated to long before Homo emerged. They are from the same sediments and only slightly older than the 3.3-million-year-old fossils unearthed from Dikika belonging to the hominid species Australopithecus afarensis.

Thompson specializes in the study of what happens to bones after an animal dies. "Fossil bones can tell you stories, if you know how to interpret them," she says.

A whole ecosystem of animals, insects, fungus and tree roots modify bones. Did they get buried quickly? Or were they exposed to the sun for a while? Were they gnawed by a rodent or chomped by a crocodile? Were they trampled on sandy soil or rocky ground? Or were they purposely cut, pounded or scraped with a tool of some kind?

One way that experimental archeologists learn to interpret marks on fossil bones is by modifying modern-day bones. They hit bones with hammer stones, feed them to carnivores and trample them on various substrates, then study the results.

Based on knowledge from such experiments, Thompson was one of three specialists who diagnosed the marks on the two bones from Dikika as butchery in a blind test, before being told the age of the fossils or their origin.

The PNAS rebuttal paper, however, also used experimental methods and came to the conclusion that the marks were characteristic of trampling.

Thompson realized that data from a larger sample of fossils were needed to chip away at the mystery.

Marks on 3.4-million-year-old bones not due to trampling, analysis confirms
"Fossil bones can tell you stories, if you know how to interpret them," Jessica Thompson 
says. For instance, the marks on this fossilized bone from the Dikika site are
 diagnostic of punctures made by crocodile teeth 
[Credit: Jessica Thompson]
The current paper investigated with microscopic scrutiny all non-hominin fossils collected from the Hadar Formation at Dikika. The researchers collected a random sample of fossils from the same deposits as the controversial specimens, as well as nearby deposits. They measured shapes and sizes of marks on the fossil bones. Then they compared the characteristics of the fossil marks statistically to the experimental marks reported in the PNAS rebuttal paper as being typical of trampling damage. They also investigated the angularity of sand grains at the site and found that they were rounded -- not the angular type that might produce striations on a trampled bone.

"The random population sample of the fossils provides context," Thompson says. "The marks on the two bones in question don't look like other marks common on the landscape. The marks are bigger, and they have different characteristics."

Trample marks tend to be shallow, sinuous or curvy. Purposeful cuts from a tool tend to be straight and create a narrow V-shaped groove, while a tooth tends to make a U-shaped groove. The study measured and quantified such damage to modern-day bones for comparison to the fossilized ones.

"Our analysis shows with statistical certainty that the marks on the two bones in question were not caused by trampling," Thompson says. "While there is abundant evidence that other bones at the site were damaged by trampling, these two bones are outliers. The marks on them still more closely resemble marks made by butchering."

One hypothesis is that butchering large animals with tools occurred during that time period, but that it was an exceedingly rare behavior. Another possibility is that more evidence is out there, but no one has been looking for it because they have not expected to find it at a time period this early.

The Dikika specimens represent a turning point in paleoanthropology, Thompson says. "If we want to understand when and how our ancestors started eating meat and moving into that ecological niche, we need to refine our search images for the field and apply these new recovery and analytical methods. We hope other researchers will use our work as a recipe to go out and systematically collect samples from other sites for comparison."

In addition to Dikika, other recent finds are shaking up long held views of hominin evolution and when typical human behaviors emerged. This year, a team led by archaeologist Sonia Harmand in Kenya reported unearthing stone tools that have been reliably dated to 3.3 million years ago, or 700,000 years older than the previous record.

"We know that simple stone tools are not unique to humans," Thompson says. "The making of more complex tools, designed for more complex uses, may be uniquely human."

Author: Carol Clark | Source: Emory Health Sciences [August 14, 2015]

Prehistoric carnivore dubbed 'scarface' discovered in Zambia

| التعليقات

Scientists at The Field Museum have identified a new species of pre-mammal in what is now Zambia. Thanks to a unique groove on the animal's upper jaw, it was dubbed Ichibengops, which combines the local Bemba word for scar (ichibenga), and the common Greek suffix for face (ops). Put simply: Scarface.

Prehistoric carnivore dubbed 'scarface' discovered in Zambia
Believed to be roughly the size of a dachshund, Ichibengops lived around 
255 million years ago [Credit: Field Museum]
Believed to be roughly the size of a dachshund, Ichibengops lived around 255 million years ago, and was a member of Therocephalia, a group of ancient mammal relatives that survived the largest mass extinction in history (the Permian-Triassic extinction). The species description was published in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology by University of Utah, University of Washington and Burke Museum, and The Field Museum.

"Discoveries of new species of animals like Ichibengops are particularly exciting because they help us to better understand the group of animals that gave rise to mammals," said Field Museum's Kenneth Angielczyk, PhD, associate curator of paleomammalogy. "One interesting feature about this species in particular is the presence of grooves above its teeth, which may have been used to transmit venom."

Indeed, venomousness is rare among mammals and their extinct relatives. Only a handful of modern mammals produce venom, including the platypus and certain species of shrews. One other extinct therocephalian, Euchambersia, has been suggested to be venomous, but even among ancient mammal relatives this is an exception rather than the rule. Although the trait is uncommon, it may have proved advantageous to carnivores by enabling them to better capture prey and defend themselves.

Angielczyk, whose work focuses on ancient mammal relatives, explained the importance of finding new species like Ichibengops. "By studying the effects of the Permian-Triassic mass extinction and the subsequent recovery, we can apply the lessons we learn to the mass extinction being caused by humans today."

Source: Field Museum [August 14, 2015]

Study shows ancient British shores teemed with life

| التعليقات

The diversity of animal life that inhabited the coastlines of South West England 200 million years ago has been revealed in a study by an undergraduate at the University of Bristol.

Study shows ancient British shores teemed with life
The marine shell-crushing reptile Psephoderma alpinum, one of the last placodonts 
on Earth, just reported from Somerset [Credit: James O’Shea]
Klara Nordén studied material from the Late Triassic sediments at the Marston Road Quarry, near Nunney in Somerset, which are rich in microscopic fossil teeth. Although the fossils were collected in the 1980s by Gloucester-based geologist Mike Curtis, they had never been studied or described – until now.

Klara’s research reveals the diverse fauna that once inhabited shallow coastal waters in what at the time was a tropical archipelago in Somerset. The study identifies a total of six species of bony fish and six species of shark as well as Pachystropheus rhaeticus, a crocodile-like animal, and a placodont, an armoured turtle-like reptile whose flat teeth were ideal for crushing the shells of invertebrate prey found in the muddy sediment on the seafloor.

Klara said: “We were excited to find teeth from a placodont, which are rare in British sediments.  The presence of placodonts indicates that the area was once a coastal environment, with shallow waters and abundant invertebrate prey.  Placodonts were in decline in the Late Triassic, and the placodont teeth from Marston Road must come from some of the last of these reptiles to exist on Earth.”

The study also reports the first finding of sphenodontians, small, lizard-like reptiles, in British marine sediments. Sphenodontians inhabited the islands in the archipelago, which they shared with Thecodontosaurus, the famous ‘Bristol dinosaur’.

Professor Michael Benton, Klara’s project supervisor, said: “It’s really unusual to find remains of land-living animals mixed in with the marine fishes and sharks. They must have been washed off the land into the shallow sea, and this provides evidence to match the age of the marine and terrestrial deposits in the area.”

Together, the fossils reveal the details of a coastal landscape lost for 200 million years. They paint a picture very different from today’s – where British shores were inhabited by exotic species of sharks, fish and turtle-like placodonts, whose armour might have protected them from the large predators roaming the waters.

Collaborator Dr Chris Duffin said: “I began working on these fossils from the Bristol area forty years ago and it's great to see such wonderful work by a Bristol undergraduate.” 

The research is published today [14 August] in Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association.

Source: University of Bristol [August 14, 2015]

Remains of ancient primate found in Oregon

| التعليقات

Scientists have unearthed fossil teeth and a jaw fragment in Oregon. And these have helped flesh out the features of an ancient animal that once lived in North America. A new species of primate, it had features similar to a modern lemur’s.

Remains of ancient primate found in Oregon
Artist’s conception of what North America’s last nonhuman primates might have
 looked like. The animals are shown on a hackberry tree. It’s the most common 
plant known from the sediment layer in which the fossils were found 
[Credit: Christopher Herndon]
Primates are a group of mammals that includes monkeys, lemurs, gorillas and humans. The Sioux are a tribe of Native Americans. The newfound primate’s genus name comes from a Sioux term for monkey: Ekgmowechashala. These last nonhuman primates to live in North America vanished around 26 million years ago. No other primates lived in North America until humans arrived well over 25 million years later. This timeline comes from the new study. It was published June 29 in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Joshua Samuels works for the National Park Service in Kimberly, Ore. As a paleontologist, he studies ancient fossils. He and his colleagues dug up the ancient primate bones between 2011 and early 2015. They found two complete teeth, two partial teeth and a jaw fragment.

All came from rocky sediment at Oregon’s John Day Formation. This rock layer, or stratum, contains fossils from between 30 million and 18 million years ago. A tooth and jaw fragment from the same species had been found there previously. All the fossils belong to a new species of Ekgmowechashala, the researchers say. Partial jaws and teeth of a related species had turned up at sites in South Dakota and Nebraska.

The scientists figured out the age of the fossils based on their position between layers of volcanic ash. The ages of those layers was already known. That let the scientists determine that the new fossils must be between 28.7 million and 27.9 million years old.

Where did the primates come from?

Millions of years ago, land connected what is now Alaska and Russia. The ancient primates probably crossed that “land bridge” around 29 million years ago, the researchers now say. That journey would have taken place some 6 million years after other North American primates had died out.

Samuels says the new fossils appear to resemble those from a 34-million-year-old primate from Thailand, in Southeast Asia. The new fossils also are similar to a 32-million-year-old primate from Pakistan, which lies between the Middle East and India.

Erik Seiffert is a paleontologist at Stony Brook University in New York. He suggested an Asian–North American primate connection back in 2007. But Samuels and his team “have laid out the evidence in more detail,” Seiffert now says.

Some researchers suspect Ekgmowechashala’s closest present-day relatives would have been tarsiers. These small primates live on islands in Southeast Asia. Other scientists think the now extinct North American primates were more closely related to lemurs. They exist only in Madagascar. It’s an island off of the East Coast of southern Africa.

K. Christopher Beard agrees with Samuels’ team that Ekgmowechashala is likely more related to the lemurs. A paleontologist, Beard works at the University of Kansas in Lawrence. But he argues that to confirm this, scientists need to find ankle bones. They should point out whether the ancient primate species had a greater kinship to lemurs or to tarsiers.

Author: Bruce Bower | Source: Student Science [August 13, 2015]

Humans responsible for demise of gigantic ancient mammals

| التعليقات

Early humans were the dominant cause of the extinction of a variety of species of giant beasts, new research has revealed.

Humans responsible for demise of gigantic ancient mammals
A glyptodon, a giant relation of the armadillo 
[Credit: WikiCommons]
Scientists at the universities of Exeter and Cambridge claim their research settles a prolonged debate over whether mankind or climate change was the dominant cause of the demise of massive creatures in the time of the sabretooth tiger, the woolly mammoth, the woolly rhino and the giant armadillo.

Known collectively as megafauna, most of the largest mammals ever to roam the earth were wiped out over the last 80,000 years, and were all extinct by 10,000 years ago.

Lewis Bartlett, of the University of Exeter, led the research, which also involved the universities of Reading and Bristol and is published in the journal Ecography. He said cutting-edge statistical analysis had helped solve the mystery almost beyond dispute, concluding that man was the dominant force in wiping out the creatures, although climate change could also have played a lesser role.

The researchers ran thousands of scenarios which mapped the windows of time in which each species is known to have become extinct, and humans are known to have arrived on different continents or islands. This was compared against climate reconstructions for the last 90,000 years.

Examining different regions of the world across these scenarios, they found coincidences of human spread and species extinction which illustrate that man was the main agent causing the demise, with climate change exacerbating the number of extinctions. However, in certain regions of the world – mainly in Asia – they found patterns which patterns were broadly unaccounted for by either of these two drivers, and called for renewed focus on these neglected areas for further study.

Lewis Bartlett, a researcher from the University of Exeter’s Centre for Ecology and Conservation, said: “As far as we are concerned, this research is the nail in the coffin of this 50-year debate - humans were the dominant cause of the extinction of megafauna. What we don’t know is what it was about these early settlers that caused this demise. Were they killing them for food, was it early use of fire or were they driven out of their habitats? Our analysis doesn’t differentiate, but we can say that it was caused by human activity more than by climate change. It debunks the myth of early humans living in harmony with nature.”

Dr Andrea Manica, of Cambridge University, was lead supervisor on the paper. He said: “Whilst our models explain very well the timing and extent of extinctions for most of the world, mainland Asia remains a mystery. According to the fossil record, that region suffered very low rates of extinctions. Understanding why megafauna in mainland Asia is so resilient is the next big question."

Source: University of Exeter [August 13, 2015]